Inspection is a necessary but non-value-adding activity whose purpose is to protect the customer from poor quality. We should therefore do as little as possible, upon condition that our inspection plan meets the customer’s requirement. Inspection plans with acceptance numbers of zero (c=0) minimize the sample size, albeit at the cost of a higher producer’s risk of rejecting lots at the specified acceptable quality level (AQL).
WHY SHOULD YOU ATTEND?
This presentation will show how to define c=0 plans whose customer protection is equivalent to that of the corresponding ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 (formerly MIL-STD 105) plan.
AREA COVERED
- How to use ANSI/ASQ Z1.4, including the definition of the sampling plan based on the inspection level, acceptable quality level (AQL), and lot size.
- How to use the standard’s switching rules to move between normal, tightened, and reduced inspection where appropriate
- Understand the benefits of double and multiple inspection plans in terms of their ability to accept good lots very quickly, and reject bad ones quickly, to reduce the average sample size.
- Convert any ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plan into a zero acceptance number (c=0) plan that provides equivalent or better protection against poor quality at the rejectable quality level (RQL). (ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plans do not have formal RQLs, but we pretend that the nonconforming fraction for which the consumer’s risk of acceptance is 10% is the RQL). A c=0 plan has a smaller sample size than any single, double, multiple, or sequential sampling plan.
- Nothing is free in industrial statistics, though, and the cost of less inspection is a higher producer’s risk of rejecting lots at the AQL. A c=0 plan should therefore be used only when quality is far better than the specified AQL.
- Generate an operating characteristic (OC) curve that compares the protection from the c=0 plan to that of the original ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plan to gain the customer’s agreement for the use of a c=0 plan.
Attendees will also receive an Excel spreadsheet that shows the operating characteristic (OC) curve for a c=0 plan and compares it to the original ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plan. Attendees can replace the example’s specification with their own.
WHO WILL BENEFIT?
- Quality Managers
- Quality Inspectors
- Quality Technicians
- Quality Engineers
- Engineering Departments
This presentation will show how to define c=0 plans whose customer protection is equivalent to that of the corresponding ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 (formerly MIL-STD 105) plan.
- How to use ANSI/ASQ Z1.4, including the definition of the sampling plan based on the inspection level, acceptable quality level (AQL), and lot size.
- How to use the standard’s switching rules to move between normal, tightened, and reduced inspection where appropriate
- Understand the benefits of double and multiple inspection plans in terms of their ability to accept good lots very quickly, and reject bad ones quickly, to reduce the average sample size.
- Convert any ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plan into a zero acceptance number (c=0) plan that provides equivalent or better protection against poor quality at the rejectable quality level (RQL). (ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plans do not have formal RQLs, but we pretend that the nonconforming fraction for which the consumer’s risk of acceptance is 10% is the RQL). A c=0 plan has a smaller sample size than any single, double, multiple, or sequential sampling plan.
- Nothing is free in industrial statistics, though, and the cost of less inspection is a higher producer’s risk of rejecting lots at the AQL. A c=0 plan should therefore be used only when quality is far better than the specified AQL.
- Generate an operating characteristic (OC) curve that compares the protection from the c=0 plan to that of the original ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plan to gain the customer’s agreement for the use of a c=0 plan.
Attendees will also receive an Excel spreadsheet that shows the operating characteristic (OC) curve for a c=0 plan and compares it to the original ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plan. Attendees can replace the example’s specification with their own.
- Quality Managers
- Quality Inspectors
- Quality Technicians
- Quality Engineers
- Engineering Departments
Speaker Profile

William A. Levinson, P.E., is the principal of Levinson Productivity Systems, P.C. He is an ASQ Fellow, Certified Quality Engineer, Quality Auditor, Quality Manager, Reliability Engineer, and Six Sigma Black Belt. He is also the author of several books on quality, productivity, and management, of which the most recent is The Expanded and Annotated My Life and Work: Henry Ford’s Universal Code for World-Class Success.
Upcoming Webinars

Transform Data into Insights: A Beginners Guide to Excel Pi…

Leadership: Strategic Planning and Decision Making

Onboarding Best Practices for 2025: Proven Strategies to Po…

Seeking Truth: Detecting Truth, Lies and Deception in a Wor…

Managing Difficult Employee Conversations

Copilot and HR: An Introduction for HR Professionals

How to Document Employee Discussions and Why it is Important

Dealing With Difficult People In Life & Work

How to Write Effective Audit Observations: The Principles f…

OSHA Requirements for Supervisors, Project Leaders & HR - W…

FDA Compliance And Laboratory Computer System Validation

4-Hour Virtual Seminar on Transformational Leadership - The…

3-Hour Virtual Boot Camp on Easier Excel Automation with VB…


2025 Handbook Overhaul: Navigating Critical Updates! Federa…

Excel Spreadsheets; Develop and Validate for 21 CFR Part 11…

Negotiating Skills For Professional Results - Winning Strat…

Building Thriving Teams: Proactive Strategies for Managers …

Designing Employee Experiences to Build a Culture of Compli…

Empowering Conflict Resolution: Letting Go to Gain Control

Navigating Alcohol and Drug Addiction Protections Under the…

President Trumps Executive Orders And What They Mean to Emp…

The Anti-Kickback Statute: 2025 - Year in Review

FDA Technology Modernization Action Plan (TMAP) and Impact …

Form W-9 Compliance: TIN Verification, B Notices, and Avoid…

Workplace Investigations 101: How to Conduct your Investiga…

50+ new Excel features so far this decade


FDA Regulation of Artificial Intelligence/ Machine Learning

From Challenges to Compliance: Understanding Dietary Supple…

Utilizing HR Metrics to Illustrate & Improve Human Resource…

Do's and Don'ts of Documenting Employee Behaviour, Performa…


The Importance of the first 5 seconds when presenting

Why EBITDA Doesn't Spell Cash Flow and What Does

Outlook - Master your Mailbox - Inbox Hero Inbox Zero

Policy Pops: Navigating DEI in the 2025 Workplace: Strategi…


Impact Assessments For Supplier Change Notices

The Monte Carlo Simulations in Excel for Risky Investments

Understanding the incredible uses and fallbacks of ChatGPT

California Meal and Rest Breaks: What You Don't Know Can Co…

Unlock Employee Loyalty: Stay Interviews Will Keep Them Eng…


Onboarding is NOT Orientation - How to Improve the New Empl…


Gossip-Free: Leadership Techniques to Quell Office Chatter

Female to Female Hostility @Workplace: All you Need to Know


6-Hour Virtual Seminar on Learning the Highlights of Excel …